HOME    Return to main CONFERENCE PAGE

James S

International Conference

Controlling Time and Shaping the Self: The Rise of Autobiographical Writing since 1750

Rotterdam 15-17 June 2006

Abstracts UPDATED 06-06-2006

Peter Burke (Emmanuel College, Cambridge): Historicizing the Self.

This paper is concerned with the relation between the microcosm of the self and the macrocosm of the cultural environment, and more especially with the effect of changing attitudes to the past in general on individuals perceptions of their own past.  Historiographically speaking, I should like to juxtapose and compare Meinecke and Koselleck on historicism and the Sattelzeit with (say) Philippe Lejeune and Charles Taylor on the history of perceptions of the self.  I shall do this from the standpoint of a historian of early modern Europe who is unhappy with the view of the period 1492-1770 as a static old regime, nothing but a foil for the real interesting modern changes.  I therefore expect to speak about biography and the Bildungsroman as well as egodocuments, and about autobiographical texts by Montaigne, Bunyan and Vico as well as by Hume, Rousseau, Gibbon, Wordsworth and Goethe.

 

Peter Burke is Professor of Cultural History at the University of Cambridge and Fellow of Emmanuel College. His books include A Social History of the Media from Gutenberg to the Internet (with Asa Briggs), Eyewitnessing. The Uses of Images as Historical Evidence, and  Varieties of Cultural History.

See: http://www.emma.cam.ac.uk/teaching/fellows/display/index.cfm?fellow=49

 


Celeste Brusati (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor): Temporality and Reflection in Dutch Still Life Painting

In the seventeenth century still-life painting became a significant site for artistic self-representation and for reflection upon both art and temporality.  Ubiquitous allusions in these pictures to time's measurement and representation - watches, hourglasses, almanacs, ledgers, journals and the like - suggest a range of contemporary preoccupations with changing conceptions and experiences of time.  The novelty and interest of these works has been largely overshadowed by a rather narrow interpretive focus on their symbolic meanings and place within the traditions of vanitas and memento mori imagery. My paper asks how we might broaden this view to take into account the distinctly visual evidence of historical subjectivity and self-perception these pictures offer. I consider not only the imagery of time but also various representational means by which Dutch still-life painters evoked different kinds of temporality and temporal experience.  My analyses of pictures by Pieter Claesz, Clara Peeters, Gerrit Dou, Evert Collier, and Cornelis Gijsbrechts among others, suggest how Dutch still lifes invited viewers to imagine themselves in and out of time, and to reflect simultaneously on the temporal dimensions of art and of their own existence.

Celeste Brusati is Professor of the History of Art at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.  Her research focuses on the imagery and ideologies of the pictorial arts in the Netherlands in the early modern period, and in particular on the role of self-imagery and self-representation in texts and images about art.  She has written on still life, self-imagery, trompe-loeil, and the interplay of visual and literary discourses of art in the Netherlands. Her books include Johannes Vermeer and Artifice and Illusion: The Art and Writing of Samuel van Hoogstraten. She is currently writing a book on fictions of the beholder and beholding in Dutch still-life and genre painting.

 

Marilyn Himmesoete (University of Paris 7 Denis Diderot): Writing and Measuring Time. Nineteenth-century French Teen­agers Dia­ries.

In the nineteenth-century, keeping a diary was often pedagogically encouraged. Although just entering their youth, many young diarists were paradoxically taken up by an obsession with time. This study of about one hundred teenage diaries, manuscripts, and printed texts uncovers a pervasive concern with daily schedules and timetables, particularly among young women from the middle class who, due to their gender, could not participate in the same scholarly activities as their male peers. Since they were encouraged to observe themselves and to practise a submissive comportment, dedicated to moderate and patient behaviour, they were subjected to the weight of time: its passage (slow or fast), its irreversible character, and the uncertainty of the future. Teenage boys and girls did not only record the details of daily events, but also reconsidered their existence in the present moment, becoming aware of it for the first time, while inscribing themselves in a past childhood more or less golden, and expressing their doubts about the future. How then does one write about time constraints in a personal diary, which has its own restrictions? Many teenagers wrote about their lack of freedom to experience time as they wished. I will discuss how some diarists creatively used the medium to free themselves from the constraints of their everyday lives.  Through the use of several examples, I will consider how the inscription and measurement of time by these nineteenth-century diarists can be read as attempts to liberate themselves from the chronological restraints of diaristic protocol. Indeed, these diaries reveal a search for free space where the control of time symbolizes a desire for illusory emancipation.

 
Marilyn Himmesoete is Teaching Assistant at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) and PhD Candidate in Nineteenth Century French Literature at the Université Paris 7-Denis Diderot (France). The topic of her thesis is: Juvenilia: diaries of nineteenth-century French teenagers.

 

Jeroen Blaak (Erasmus University Rotterdam): Autobiographies of Self-Made Men in the Netherlands in the Nineteenth Centu­ry.

In the nineteenth century in the Netherlands the number of autobiographies written by social climbers rose. This can be attributed to the increase in (upward) social mobility during the course of the nineteenth century but it is also an effect of the growing importance of middle-class (bourgeois) values. This paper addresses the question how these Dutch autobiographers made their life-stories into narratives of success. For most of them, success what not so much about greater wealth but about increased social status. Politeness instead of fortune is what makes them distinct. They became part of higher, polite strata by virtue of diligence and discipline, but almost never show any sign of having been ambitious. Although up to a certain point they considered themselves to be self-made men, success is never boasted about and often seems more a reward than an explicit goal. Moreover, they present their politeness as something innate, making social mobility a logical aspect of their life. Despite this logic, most autobiographers express their constant insecurity about moving in higher classes. And all show a keen awareness of the social hierarchy, in early nineteenth-century autobiographies even more so than in personal narratives written after the 1870s, which could point to a growing acceptance of the self-made success story in a modernizing country.

 

Jeroen Blaak is a researcher at Erasmus University Rotterdam, participating in the program Controlling Time and Shaping the Self. He studied history at the Erasmus University and wrote a PhD-thesis on reading in the early modern Dutch Republic, which was published by Verloren, Hilversum in 2004: Geletterde levens. Dagelijks lezen en schrijven in de vroegmoderne tijd in Nederland, 1624-1770.



Pieter Stokvis (Open University of the Netherlands): Changing Self-Portraits and Partner Profiles in Dutch Matrimonial Advertisements from 1825 until 1925.

Since about 1825 matrimonial advertisements had become an established if not openly acknowledged way to seek a partner, for in the year 1850 the phrasing was already business-like and a reason was seldom given. The framers were exclusively male with a good number of widowers among them. The men desirous of marrying were in general over thirty. Social class figured large in their self-portraits as did good looks and health and qualities referred to as respectable. Considerations concerning property or capital were stated in eight out of ten advertisements. The rare mention of bonds of  love in 1850 and 1875 hints at more romantic longings. In 1875, 10 out of 25 (male) framers asked for a photo, a new phenomenon which may have become taken for granted in later years. On account of their capital, income or profession the men aged between thirty and forty ranged from lower to upper middle class. About their own looks and character they were very brief. The same is true for the profile of the lady they were looking for. In 1900 women advertised too. Status and wealth was indicated by mentioning specific  professions. Appreciated in a partner were as before, the input of capital and sometimes a distinguished appearance. In 1925 more women than men  mostly white-collar professionals  advertised. Most women professed to be looking for a man with a good job and capable of supporting them. The favourite epithet was now civilized instead of respectable. Other new features were the appreciation of a youthful appearance and a good education, signalling a growing search for intellectual equality and comradeship. In spite of the tendency of matrimonial advertisements to become less personal, more condensed and standardized with every sample year, they still reveal some remarkable shifts in portraying the self and profiling a matching partner.   

 

Pieter Stokvis is senior lecturer in cultural history at the Open University of the Netherlands.  His most recent books, the first based on interviews, the second on autobiographical writings, deal with private and domestic life in the 20th century (Huishouden, huwelijk, gezin, 2002) and the bourgeois experience in the Netherlands during the 19th century (Het intieme burgerleven , 2005).

 

Ofer Nur (University of California, Los Angeles): Can there be a Collective Egodocument? Self-writing and the Kibbutz as a collective experience.
My paper examines a collective "diary" of a group of Zionists who came to
Palestine in 1920 in order to establish and live in a kibbutz. This group had attempted to write a collective diary as a form of bonding. Its purpose was to reflect a biographical unity of several individuals. In my talk I will present this document which on the one hand is rare as a type of document, but at the same time is remarkable in how it reflects the conscious spirit of the time in which it was written. I will also discuss how the group tried to achieve a collective "soul" and how the document shows the failure of this fantasy. The question I pose is the following: Is a collective egodocument possible? It sounds like asking: can a triangle be round? But the group definitely tried to create a collective unity, an experiment that failed, although its fascinating human-figurational dynamics are traceable.

Ofer Nordheimer Nur is a lecturer at the department of history at UCLA. In 2004 he received his PhD at the same department and then won a post-doctoral fellowship at the Centre d'Etudes Juives at the EHESS in Paris where he examined the work of Lucien Goldmann, the death of God and the tragic vision of the world in the Zionist youth movements intellectual orbit in Central Europe in the 1920s. For his dissertation Dr Nur wrote a cultural history of a group of young men and women who were some of the founders of the kibbutz movement in Palestine in the 1920s. Currently, Dr Nur is rewriting his dissertation for a book publication at the University of California Press (pre-contract). Dr Nur's next project looks at the intellectual origins and work of the late historian and scholar Amos Funkenstein.

Wim Denslagen (University of Utrecht): The Dual Meaning of Authenticity.

It seems that Romanticism created the cult of the authentic. Even in the arts one had to be authentic, which entailed an attitude that resulted in the total rejection of classicism. Romanticism killed the classical canon in the arts, with its unceasing search for essentials. The cult of authenticity even showed a sustained influence on the world of architectural preservation. In this domain even historical architecture had to remain authentic and in this way the cult created a second meaning for the notion of authenticity. 

 

Wim Denslagen is architectural historian and specialized in the history and theory of conservation. He has published on architectural theory and is author of Architectural Restoration in Western Europe: Controversy and Continuity (Amsterdam, Architectura & Natura Press, 1994). His latest books include Romantisch modernisme. Nostalgie in de monumentenzorg (Amsterdam, Sun, 2004) and  together with Niels Gutschow -  Architectural Imitations. Reproductions and Pastiches in East and West (Maastricht, Shaker, 2005). Presently he is preparing a sourcebook on architectural preservation, commissioned by the Ministry of Culture in the Netherlands. He is professor at the University of Utrecht.

 

Eveline Koolhaas-Grosfeld (University of Amsterdam):  Physiognomy and Unmasking in the eighteenth-century Dutch Republic.

Does the soul have a shape? Is it possible to know about someones inner life from her or his face? In the eighteenth century this ancient question about the possibilities of physiognomy became an urgent problem. For if we may believe the spectators and other critical observers of social life, in their era the art of pretence, formerly restricted to civility at court, had reached the upper middle-class circles. If we look at portraits and examine books of manners, there appears to be some truth in what they say. This lecture focuses on some of the negative reactions to pretending, assuming that they reflect and constitute a certain degree of self-awareness. My first example is a Dutch book on civility published in 1735 (2nd edition 1755), in which pretence is explained as hiding ones feelings, thoughts and character, in order to adopt the personality of someone else, whose friendship might be useful, socially speaking. However, the author labels this kind of behaviour as typically French or Italian, and contrasts it with the typical Dutch openness, leaving his readers the choice and stimulating reflection upon their own national, republican identity. In books of manners such as this, physiognomic knowledge is recommended as a tool to understanding the character of that important friend, in fact to promote adaptation. But as I wish to show in the second part of this lecture, in Lavaters immensely popular Physiognomische Fragmente zur Beförderung der Menschenkenntnis und Menschenliebe (1775-1778) it is the other way round. Lavater presents his physiognomy as the cure for the art of pretending. His method of tracing someones character in their features, seems indeed to make pretence superfluous. Since it is impossible to alter the forehead, nose, mouth, etcetera, everyone is determined to keep their personal identity and according to Lavater, should be respected the way they are. After a short discussion of Lavaters physiognomic method, and why he thinks it benefits the whole of society, we finally turn to a different, more sophisticated physiognomic technique such as proposed by the Dutch physician and theorist of art, Petrus Camper. His physiognomic lectures at the Amsterdam Art Academy in 1774 will introduce some new, individualistic approaches in portraiture.

 

Eveline Koolhaas-Grosfeld is an art historian. She has published several articles on nationalism in Dutch art criticism of the 18th- and early 19th-century, on Dutch landscape and genre-painting and ethnographic prints of the same period; she is co-author with J. Kloek and W. Mijnhardt, of 1800 Blueprints for a National Community (Assen, Van Gorcum 2004) and published Father and Sons. Jacob de Vos Wzn (1774-1844) in which she edited the journals Jacob de Vos drew daily for his children (Hilversum, Verloren 2001). Currently she is editor of the forthcoming Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek on Louis Napoleon, the first king of Holland and preparing her thesis on the early-19th century Amsterdam publisher of prints and books, Evert Maaskamp.

 

 Lisa Kuitert (University of Amsterdam): Knowing the Writer, by Portrait: The Influence of Photography on Authors and Authorship in the Nineteenth Century.

In this paper I would like to examine writers and photography by focusing on the impact of photographic portraits of writers on the production, distribution and consumption of literature in the 19th century. What was the specific nature of writers portraits, and what were the conventions in this respect. Was the writer the owner of his own image? Or is it more appropriate to speak of a new marketing/publishing strategy?  How did the public react to the writer's image?  For many people, the visual aspect of culture is a powerful component of cultural communication, because what is seen may be the surface of an underlying and unseen system of meaning. The 19th century is particularly interesting in this respect, as the visual began to be more and more exploited during this period. For the 19th-century reader, words and images were combined increasingly often, in the form of illustrated novels and magazines.

 

Lisa Kuitert is professor in Book and Manuscript Studies at the University of Amsterdam, and is also leading the Masters programme on Publishing & Editing, at the same university. She has published several studies on the relationship between book history and history of literature, in the 19th and 20th century (Het ene boek in vele delen. De uitgave van literaire series 1850-1900  and Het uiterlijk behang. Series in de Nederlandse literatuur 1945-1997), and on authorship, De waarde van woorden (2002). She is editor of the leading Dutch periodical on book history, De Boekenwereld, and also participates on the editorial board of Quaerendo. A quarterly journal from the Low Countries devoted to  manuscripts and printed books. She contributes on a regular basis to leading Dutch journals such as Vrij Nederland and De Groene Amsterdammer.

 

Ann  Jensen Adams (University of California, Santa Barbara): Time in and of the Dutch Seventeenth-Century Por­trait.

This paper examines some of the varieties of time both as idea and as experience, as revealed through a few portraits commissioned by 17th-century Dutch men and women.  As I discuss, academic concepts of time, pressures to measure increasingly smaller units of time, and the resulting subjective experience of time underwent radical transformation over the course of the century. In some of their very novel and experimental qualities they provide a material and accessible visual counterpart to and in some cases precedents for, debates concerning the nature of time, raging in humanist circles, and pressures to more precisely measure time, promoted in commercial ones.  In explicating the different forms of time evidenced in seventeenth-century Dutch thought  and portraits  the  paper distinguishes concepts of time between "God's Time - Eternity" and then discusses the various forms of "Man's Time" focusing upon the narrative of time and the description of a particular moment for both the sitter and particularly the viewer.

 

Ann Jensen Adams received her PhD in Fine Arts from Harvard University and is now an Associate Professor in the History of Art and Architecture at the University of California at Santa Barbara.  This academic year she is a Research Scholar at the Getty Research Institute.  Her book, Public Faces and Private Identities in Seventeenth-Century Holland:  Portraiture and the Production of Community is scheduled to be published by Cambridge University Press this Fall.  She edited a collection of essays, also for Cambridge University Press, New Approaches to Rembrandt.  Bathsheba Reading David's Letter which appeared in 1998, and curated and wrote the exhibition catalogue to Dutch and Flemish Paintings from New York Private Collections for the National Academy of Design in 1988.  She has published widely in edited volumes and exhibition catalogues as well as such journals as the Art Bulletin, Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek, Renaissance Quarterly, and a forthcoming essay in De Zeventiende Eeuw.  Her current projects include a book on the Theory and practice in the art and architecture of the Amsterdam portrait painter Thomas de Keyser, a Dutch transcription and English translation, with Introductory essays Crafting a Life: The Personal Account Book of Utrecht Patrician Carel Martens (1602-1649), and a book on her Getty Research project this year  The Presence of History, The Persistence of Time in Seventeenth-Century Dutch Art, from which her paper here is drawn:  Time IN and OF the 17th-century Dutch Portrait.

See: http://www.arthistory.ucsb.edu/faculty/adams.php

 

Philippe Lejeune (University of Paris-Nord): M.A. Jullien Jr et le contrôle du temps.

I  will present the educational project of Marc-Antoine Jullien (1775-1848), author of pedagogical treatises in part inspired by Pestalozzi. Starting point is his Essai sur l'emploi du temps (1808), a method for self surveillance which at the time corresponded with its spatial counterpart, the panopticon of  Bentham (1790), an architectural plan for prisons, in which everything which happened inside could be observed from a central point. Jullien proposed applying the three methods to a personal life, which had made modern civilization a success: a religious and philosophical method (self-examination of conscience), a military method (inspection), and a commercial method (keeping an account book). Addressing boys of  15 to 25 years, he wanted them to write three journals each day (The Mémorial analytique, the Agenda général and the Biomčtre) to use their time in the most useful and virtuous way. We scarcely know who actually applied this method, but the regular reprinting of these books from 1810 to 1830 seems to indicate that they were influential.

Philippe Lejeune taught French Literature at the Université Paris-Nord  from 1972 to 2004. In 1992 he was  co-founder of the Association pour l'Autobiographie (APA) which collects all autobiographical writings in manuscript which authors or owners are willing to transfer. He studies autobiography and diary-writing. His most recent publications are: Signes de vie. Le pacte autobiographique 2 (Paris, Seuil, 2005) and, in collaboration with Catherine Bogaert, Le Journal intime. Histoire et anthologie (Paris, Textuel, 2006).

See: http://www.autopacte.org/

 

Marina Warner (University of Essex): Stranger Magic. Time Travel and Other Selves.

The word medium was extended to include individuals in l854, and trance mediums - especially female mediums - began channelling different personalities from other places and other times. Many of these spirit visitors, or spirit 'controls', communicated the medium's earlier existences and alter egos. These experiences helped fashion modern conceptions of  'the multiple self', and continue to illuminate problems about the stability and unity of individual consciousness. Such ethereal presences are also often exotic: time travelling also offered writers such as W.B. Yeats and James Merrill possibilities of occupying a different sex, gender, and ethnos. The talk will be illustrated with records from the work of the mediums Eusapia Paladino, Helene Smith, and Eva Carriere.

 

Marina Warner is professor at the University of Essex. She is a writer of fiction, criticism and history; her works include novels and short stories as well as studies of female myths and symbols. She recently published  Fantastic Metamorphoses, Other Worlds. Ways of Telling the Self (Oxford University Press). Her new book Phantasmagoria: Spirit Visions, Metaphors, and Media will be published by Oxford UP  this autumn.

See:http://www.marinawarner.com/

 

Dror Wahrman (Indiana University, Bloomington): Proteus Unbound: Personal Identity before the Self.

In recent years we have grown accustomed to the idea that the supposed universality of the individual subject with a well-defined, stable, centred self is in fact a charged, far from natural, recent Western construct. While this insight has been pioneered by philosophers, anthropologists and literary critics, it puts the ball squarely back in the historians court: if this construct is not universal and trans-historical, then what were the historical circumstances, specific to a particular time and place, that can account for its emergence, its development, and its ultimate naturalization as a supposed universal?  In my lecture, based on my recent book The Making of the Modern Self, I will offer a historical narrative for the development of modern notions of identity and self. Employing a comparative analysis across time of a variety of cultural forms, I will set up a contrast between two very different identity regimes: an ancien régime of identity in the eighteenth century, and a more recognizably modern one in the closing decades of the eighteenth and into the nineteenth century. In addition to documenting the sharp, discontinuous shift from one to the other, I hope  as far as time will allow  to gesture toward a possible explanation of this shift in its particular historical circumstances; as well as to point to its consequences, observable across a wide cross-section of eighteenth-century culture, that underlay many of the new departures we associate with the modern.

 

Dror Wahrman, Ruth N. Halls Professor of History and Director of the Center for Eighteenth-Century Studies at Indiana University, is a cultural historian of Western Europe during the transition from the pre-modern to the modern, focusing especially on Britain. His recent The Making of the Modern Self: Identity and Culture in Eighteenth-Century England (Yale University Press, 2004) was the winner of the Ben Snow Prize of the North American Conference on British Studies and the Louis Gottschalk Prize of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies. Having completed his PhD at Princeton University under the direction of Professor Lawrence Stone, he has also taught at the University of Warwick and the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and served a term as the associate editor of the American Historical Review. His previous publications include Imagining the Middle Class: The Political Representation of Class in Britain, c. 1780-1840 (Cambridge, 1995), The Age of Cultural Revolutions (edited with Colin Jones: Berkeley, 2002), and several publications on the history of Palestine and of early photography in the Middle East. He is currently co-writing with Professor Jonathan Sheehan (University of Michigan) a book on notions of order and disorder, change and harmony, providence and self-organization in the West from the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries.

 See: http://www.indiana.edu/~histweb/pages/faculty_and_staff/biographies/wahrman.htm

Alfred Messerli (University of Zürich): Swiss Popular Almanacs 1700-1900. Construction of Time by Numbers, Text and Pictures.

The starting point is a corpus of Swiss-German popular almanacs comprising all the extant issues from the earliest examples through to the year 1800, which have been documented, described and evaluated by three doctoral researchers in a four-year SNSF research project (2003-2007). These form the basis for some fundamental reflections on the time concept and the developmental logic of ideas of time as contained in these almanacs and offered for consideration and consumption. Three levels of mediation can be distinguished: time concepts are thematized narratively, as exempla; furthermore they are depicted visually, for instance on the cover pages; and finally they are incorporated into the arrangement and layout of the calendar as a perceptual grid. One unanswered question is how great a role the almanac played in the popularization of innovative time concepts. It also remains to be determined how and when during the evolution of the printed almanac the various time-levels of present, past and future are activated. Cognisance of temporality is followed by the striving to deal with it economically, which is attained by evaluating the past. Only in the course of the 19th century is active time planning extended to include the future. Time now becomes a factor in production and people gradually learn to live with notice periods and deadlines. Another issue to be addressed is that different time concepts coexist with and alongside one another in the almanac.

Alfred Messerli studied German Language and Literature, Social History and European Folk Literature at the Universities of Zurich and Bremen. He is co-editor of the historical-critical edition of the writings of Ulrich Bräker (published to date: Vols. 1-4; C.H. Beck Verlag, Munich 1998-2000); his professorial dissertation Lesen und Schreiben 1700 bis 1900. Untersuchung zur Durchsetzung der Literalität in der Schweiz (Reading and writing 1700-1900. Study of the establishment of literacy in Switzerland) was published in 2002 by the Max Niemeyer Verlag in Tübingen. He teaches at the University of Zurichs Institute for Popular Cultures, in the European Folk Literature Department.

http://www.ipk.unizh.ch/vl/institut/p-am.html

 

Molly MacCarthy (Wellesley College): The Diary versus the Pocket-Watch. Understanding Time in Nineteenth-Century America.

This paper will examine how nineteenth-century Americans told time. In  spite of the mass production of watches and the rise of clock time,  many Americans were connected to older ways of understanding time, as  evidenced by another pocket-sized innovation that had grown in  popularity by the mid-nineteenth century  the prefabricated diary.  The day, and not the hour, remained supreme for many who did not  require the temporal precision of a pocket watch and instead turned to  their diaries to tell the time.  

 

Molly A. McCarthey  is since 2004 visiting Assistant Professor, Wellesley College. She received her PhD in 2004 at Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts. Her dissertation is titled, A Page, A Day: A History of the Daily Diary in America. She has gained several awards and fellowships, most recently the Allan Nevins Prize Nomination of the Brandeis History Department, the Mellon Post-Dissertation Fellowship of the American Antiquarian Society, and a Newberry Library Resident Fellowship. A Page, A Day: A History of the Daily Diary in America, will shortly be published. She has also worked as a reporter and staff writer and was as a member of the Newsday reporting team awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Spot News Reporting in July 1996.

 

Avriel Bar-Levav (The Open University of Israel): The Right T ime in Nineteenth-Century Hebrew Autobiographies.

Writing an autobiography in Hebrew in the nineteenth century was both an act of rebellion against Jewish tradition and an attempt to reconstruct a better Jewish society, together with shaping and presenting the author's life. The concept of doing things at the right time is an important theme in those autobiographies. This theme will be analyzed in the paper.

 

Avriel Bar-Levav is head of the department of History, Philosophy and J udaic Studies at the Open U niversity of Israel. He is editor of the Hebrew scholarly quarterly Pe'amim. Journal for the Study of Oriental Jewry, published by the Ben Zvi Institute, Jerusalem.  He has published articles in Hebrew and English about Jewish attitudes towards death, Jewish rituals in the early modern period, magic, and autobiograp hies.

 

Davíđ Ólafsson (University of St. Andrews): Diaries in the State of  Scribal Culture. The Rise of

Diary Writing in Nineteenth-Century Iceland and its Cultural Context.

In this paper I will approach the rise of diary writing among common Icelanders in the nineteenth century within the framework of the democratization of scribal culture in the modern period. From the odd circumstances of universal reading-skills and ever-increasing ability to write among the general public from the beginning of the nineteenth century, but at the same time, only an embryonic print culture and a virtual lack of a cultural structure usually associated with print culture, grew a period of popular scribal culture consisting of circulation, creation and consumption of handwritten texts. This goes hand in hand with the growth of other uses of writing, for example diaries, autobiographies and correspondence in what can be termed the age of popular handwriting in Icelandic cultural history. Drawing from the studies by scholars like Harold Love, Peter Beal and Margaret Ezell of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century English literature, I will argue that the act of handwriting endured as an important medium of literature and historical writings up to the turn of the twentieth century and that the rise of diary-writing and indeed autobiographical writings in the nineteenth century was embedded in and empowered by that cultural situation.

 

Davíđ Ólafsson received his BA in History and Literary Studies from the University of Iceland followed by an MA in history from the same university in 1999, where his main focus was on microhistory and diary writing in 18th- and 19th-century Iceland: Diaries and diary-writing in 18th, 19th- and 20t -century Iceland. (Dagbćkur og dagbókaritun á 18. 19. og 20. öld.). After working as an independent researcher at the Reykjavík Academy 1998-2004, David became a PhD student in history at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland in autumn 2004. His microhistorical study on manuscript culture in 19th-century Iceland in largely based on the diaries of Sighvatur Grímsson, a farmer and a lay scholar (1840-1930). His publications include: Barefoot Historians. Education in Iceland in the Modern Period. Writing Peasants. Studies on peasant literacy in early modern Northern Europe. Edited by Klaus-Joachim Lorenzen-Schmidt and Bjřrn Poulsen. (Kerteminde: Landbohistorisk Selskab, 2002), pp. 175-209. With Sigurđur Gylfi Magnússon.

See: http://www.microhistory.org

 

 

Sigurđur Gylfi Magnússon (The Reykjavik Akademy): Dreams of Things Past. Life Writing in Iceland

Iceland has a long tradition of biographical writing. Over the centuries Icelanders have been telling stories about unusual and noteworthy people and the things they had been through, and set many of them down in written form. The sagas of Icelanders  the Icelandic family sagas as they are known  provided the actual models for accounts of this kind, most of which dealt with ordinary people going about their daily lives. When the modern autobiography took shape in the early years of the twentieth century it owed a great deal to these antecedents, which set their mark on its form and techniques. In addition it received the legacy of the modern development of the self as it had taken shape in Western culture since the time of the Enlightenment. The outcome was frequently an interesting mixture of the European literary heritage and the native Icelandic narrative tradition. In two recently published works of mine, Dreams of Things Past: Life Writing in Iceland, and Metastories: Memory, Recollection, and History, I discuss this world of twentieth-century life writing (or auto-literature) and how it changed and developed during the course of the century. In my paper I intend to show how collective memory, historical memory and individual memory affected the way in which Icelanders wrote about the past and formed their own self in autobiographies.

 

Sigurđur Gylfi Magnússon completed his BA in history at the University of Iceland in 1984 and PhD at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburg, USA in 1993 (Dissertation: The Continuity of Everyday Life: Popular Culture in Iceland 1850-1940). Sigurđur has worked as an independent researcher at the Reykjavik Academy and as a lecturer at the University of Iceland, Reykjavík University and Bifröst University College in Iceland. He has published numerous books and articles in the fields of cultural history, microhistory and historiography, both in Iceland, Europe and USA. His most recent publications are: Social History as Sites of Memory? The Institutionalization of History: Microhistory and the Grand Narrative. To be published in Journal of Social History, Spring 2006. (In Icelandic.) Metastories: Memory, Recollection, and History. Anthology from Icelandic Popular Culture 11. Published by the Icelandic University Press, 2005.  (Sjálfssögur. Minni, minningar og saga. Gestaritstjóri Soffía Auđur Birgisdóttir. Sýnisbók íslenskrar alţýđumenningar 11 (Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan, 2005)). (In Icelandic.) Dreams of Things Past: Life Writing in Iceland. Anthology from Icelandic Popular Culture 9. Published by the Icelandic University Press, 2004 (Fortíđardraumar. Sjálfsbókmenntir á Íslandi. Gestaritstjóri Guđmundur Hálfdanarson. Sýnisbók íslenskrar alţýđumenningar 9 (Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan, 2004)). The Singularization of History: Social History and Microhistory within the Postmodern State of Knowledge. Journal of Social History, 36 (Spring 2003), pp. 701-735.

See:http://www.akademia.is/sigm and www.microhistory.org

 

Thomas Max Safley (University of Pennsylvania): Time is Money. The Construction and Reconstruction of Time in the Testimonies of Early Modern Bankrupts.

Time plays a role in business failure as  well.  In the testimonies of early modern bankrupts, the timing of events and their precise sequence forms an integral part of the   defaulters' self-representations.  This paper will explore the changing relationship between remembered time and represented self in order to come to a more precise understanding of both.

 

Thomas Max Safley is Professor of Early Modern European History  at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a member of the Research Group on Self-Narrative in Transcultural Perspective at the Free University of Berlin and of the Institute of European Cultural History at the University of Augsburg.  He received his PhD in 1980 from the University of Wisconsin.  A specialist in the economic and social history of early modern Europe, roughly 1450-1750, he has published extensively on the history of marriage and the family, of poverty and charity, of labor and business. In addition to numerous articles and reviews, Professor Safley is author of Let No Man Put Asunder: The Control of Marriage in the German Southwest, 1550-1620 (1984), Charity and Economy in the Orphanages of Early Modern Augsburg (1996), Matheus Miller's Memoirs: A Merchant's Life in the Seventeenth Century (2000), Die Aufzeichnungen des Matheus Miller (2003) and Children of the Laboring Poor: Expectation and Experience among the Orphans of Early Modern Augsburg (2005).  He is co-editor of The Workplace before the Factory: Artisans and Proletarians, 1500-1800 (1993) and of Perspectives from the Past (1998),  and he has edited a volume of essays on The Reformation of Charity: The Secular and the Religious in Early Modern Poor Relief (2003).

See: http://www.history.upenn.edu/faculty/safley.htm

 

James Amelang (Universidad Autonoma, Madrid): Tracing Lives. The Spanish Inquisition and the Act of Autobiography.

Jeopardy in the past can be a source of comfort in the present. Such, at least, is the typically grateful reaction of the historian who reads the numerous trazas de la vida - literally, "traces of life" - whose creation was mandated by the Spanish Inquisition during the early modern era. Distinct from the often close questioning of suspects during interrogations, these were oral autobiographies brought into being by the simple command at the beginning of proceedings to tell one's life story. There were substantial variations among such narratives; some were telegraphically brief and unrevealing, while others ran to a considerable length and dealt with a wide range of topics, including intimate beliefs and behaviour. However, all shared at least three characteristics: looseness of structure (thanks to the absence of any specific model apart from general confessions); transformation of their oral origins into written outcomes (thanks to their transcription by notarial scribes); and above all, the paradox of existing as a spontaneous tale within a setting that was anything but spontaneous, and indeed, full of risk. This paper briefly examines trazas as a source for early modern autobiography, within a historiographic context that is at last beginning to pay attention to them.

 

James S. Amelang has been Professor of Early Modern History at the Universidad Autónoma of Madrid since 1989. The author of several works on the social and cultural history of early modern Barcelona, beginning with Honored Citizens of Barcelona: Patrician Culture and Class Relations, 1490-1714 (Princeton University Press, 1986), he has also translated and edited A Journal of the Plague Year: The Diary of the Barcelona Tanner Miquel Parets, 1651 (Oxford University Press, 1991). Most recently, he has published The Flight of Icarus: Artisan Autobiography in Early Modern Europe (Stanford University Press, 1998). His main project now is to finish The Oxford History of Early Modern Spain. For the more distant future, he plans to publish a study (tentatively titled Writing Cities) of aspects of urban discourse in early modern Europe.

See: http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/filoyletras/amelang/

 

Petra Buchholz (Freie Universität Berlin): The Second World War and Autobio­graphy in Japan. Tales of War and the "Movement for one's own history" in Japan.
Tales of War are an amazing mass phenomenon in Japan, and the massive presence of these private war accounts on the literary market is even more striking. Several writing-movements like the "Movement for one's own history" (jibunshi-undô) gave a strong impetus to personal writings about  war-experiences. In my paper I will give an overview about writing-movements in Japan since the 1920s, and discuss their contributions to form and content of autobiographical writings, as well as on their spread and commercialization.
 
Petra Bucholz received the Diplom-Pädagogin in 1975, and did several years of professional work in education, for instance the founding and supervision of a Free School in Berlin. Since 1984 she has concentrated in the study of Japanology at the Berlin Free University. From 1987 to 1991 lecturer in German language, Culture and Politics at the Yamanashi-University in Kofu, Japan. Her doctorate in Japanology  followed in 1999, title of dissertation: Schreiben und Erinnern. Über Selbstzeugnisse japanischer Kriegsteilnehmer (Writing and Remembering. About Egodocuments of Japanese Participants at War) (2003). Since 2004 she has been a member of the Research Group: "Selbstzeugnisse in transkultureller Perspektive" at Berlins Free University.
See: http://web.fu-berlin.de/japanologie/mitarbeiter/buchholz.shtml
 

Peter Fritzsche (University of Illinois at Urbana-Cham­paign­): Writing in Difference. Drastic

History and the Produc­tion of Autobio­graphy.

My contribution intends to indicate the ways in which history reconstituted private life, or more precisely how perceptions of historical change after 1800 rearranged conceptions of the autobiographical self and domestic space.  Rather than opposing public and private, I explore how historical eventfulness in the early nineteenth century made more pertinent (or dramatized) the idea of the contemporary or the "Zeitgenossen" and thus enabled the production, consumption, and back-and-forth traffic of autobiographical texts.  Private histories also became more "telling" in marking differences among cultural traditions in what might be called the domestication of history.  Finally, I suggest how formal models of historical change came to be applied to the visualization of change in personal time and to the 
archiving of personal continuities in a trans-Atlantic context.

 

Peter Fritzsche studied history at the University of California, Berkeley, and is professor at the Department of History, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His books include

 Stranded in the Present:  Modern Time and the Melancholy of History, Harvard 2004

Germans into Nazis, Harvard 1998 (pub. 1999). Reading Berlin 1900, Harvard 1996 (pub. 1998). A Nation of Fliers: German Aviation and the Popular Imagination, Harvard 1992 (pub. 1994), Rehearsals for Fascism: Populism and Political Mobilization in Weimar Germany, Oxford 1990. He co-edited